Apollo 17 Mission
Landing Site Overview
Landing Site Selection
Because Apollo 17 was the last lunar landing of the program, all of the high-priority candidate landing sites were given consideration again. However, many were eliminated from consideration for either scientific or operational reasons. A landing near the central peaks of Copernicus crater had long been considered, but was now regarded as of lower priority, both because some Apollo 12 samples may have provided an age for this impact event and because three landings had already occurred in the vicinity of Mare Imbrium. A landing in the southern highlands near Tycho crater was rejected because of concerns about rough terrain and mission safety. A landing on the lunar farside in Tsiolkovsky crater was considered but rejected because of operational difficulties and the added expense of providing the communications satellites that would be necessary to maintain radio contact between the landing site and ground controllers. A highland site southwest of Mare Crisium was considered, but was rejected because this region of the Moon was easily accessible to spacecraft launched by the Soviet Union. In fact, the Luna 20 spacecraft landed in this region in February 1972, just a week after the Apollo 17 site selection was made, and returned 30 grams of samples to Earth for analysis.
This left three sites in the final consideration: Alphonsus crater; the central peaks of Gassendi crater, to the north of Mare Humorum; and the Taurus-Littrow valley on the eastern margin of Mare Serenitatis. The primary objectives were, in order of priority:
- Old highland material. The first priority was obtaining samples of old highlands material (older than the Imbrium impact) from as large a distance as possible from the Imbrium basin. All three of the final candidate sites were between 800 and 1000 kilometers from the Imbrium basin.
- Young volcanic material. The second objective was investigating the possible existence of young (less than 3 billion year old) volcanic activity. This was considered important both for understanding the thermal evolution of the Moon and also because interpretations of orbital photography suggested that young volcanism might have been explosive in nature and hence associated with a high abundance of volatile materials such as water.
- Orbital science. There were two competing objectives for obtaining orbital science coverage on the Apollo 17 mission. First, there was a desire to have orbital ground tracks that had minimal overlap with those of Apollo 15 and 16, so that the maximum amount of new information could be obtained. On the other hand, because Apollo 17 carried several new instruments, overlapping ground tracks with earlier missions would allow data from the new and old instruments to be compared over common areas.
- ALSEP Experiments. Finally, factors related to the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package played less of a role on Apollo 17 than on some prior missions. This was because the seismometers, magnetometers, and laser ranging retroreflectors deployed on earlier missions formed networks across the Moon's surface, but no such network instruments were included on this mission. Although there was some desire to place the Heat Flow Experiment in an environment different from that on Apollo 15, this had no influence on the final site selection as both Apollo 15 and 17 landed very close to impact basin rims.
At the time of the Apollo 16 landing site selection, Alphonsus was regarded as the primary candidate for the Apollo 17 landing site. This site had the dual objectives of sampling highland material in the crater wall and possible young volcanic material at several dark-halo craters on the Alphonsus crater floor. However, there was concern that highlands materials in the Alphonsus crater wall were covered by later deposits and would be inaccessible to the crew. As sampling such material was the primary goal of the mission, the Alphonsus site was judged the least scientifically interesting of the three final candidates.
Gassendi was regarded as a scientifically interesting site which offered the possibility of sampling ancient highland rocks in the crater's central peak as well as providing ages for both the Humorum basin impact and the Gassendi crater impact. However, there were no known regions of possible young volcanism near the landing site. Moreover, the terrain just outside the planned landing site is quite rough, and if the crew landed in this region, it was not certain that they could achieve the primary objective of sampling Gassendi's central peaks. The orbital science potential was considered high for this mission, with little overlap with earlier missions. Also, Mare Orientale would have been overflown in sunlight for the first time in the Apollo program. However, these advantages were not sufficient to overcome the site's other difficulties.
Taurus-Littrow is a narrow valley in the Montes Taurus mountains, which form the rim of the Serenitatis impact basin. Samples obtained from the north and south walls of the valley were expected to provide the desired samples of ancient highland material as well as allow determination of the age of the Serenitatis impact event. In particular, a prominent landslide along the southern wall of the valley was expected to put highland material within reach of the crew. From orbit, the Apollo 15 crew had observed several craters in this region that are surrounded by deposits of very dark material. These so-called dark halo craters were interpreted as volcanic cinder cones. These were generally considered to be relatively young features, although some investigators pointed to features in the Apollo 15 photographs that indicated these deposits are actually very old. One of these craters, Shorty, was near the selected landing site and was another important objective of the mission. Finally, samples obtained from the floor of the valley would allow the age of the mare material to be determined. Despite the narrowness of the valley and the high (1.5 to 2 kilometers) mountains on either side, Apollo 15 photography showed that the Lunar Module could land safely in this region. Moreover, the primary objectives of the mission could be achieved even if the Lunar Rover failed. One drawback of this landing site is that it is at the boundary between mare basalts and a basin rim, an environment very similar to that sampled by Apollo 15. Nevertheless, the other advantages of this site led to its selection as the Apollo 17 landing site.
The landing site selected for Apollo 17 was in the Taurus-Littrow Valley on the eastern rim of Mare Serenitatis. The two primary objectives were obtaining samples of highland material that were older than the Imbrium impact and investigating the possibility of young, explosive volcanism in this region.
Orbital Views of the Landing Site
Stereoscopic Views of the Landing Site
Red/Green (Anaglyph) Images
To view anaglyph stereo pairs you need red-green (or red-blue) stereo glasses. These glasses have a red lens over the left eye and green (or blue) lens over the right eye.
Black and White Images
To view side-by-side stereo pairs, use pocket stereo viewers (obtainable from local educational suppliers, bookstores, etc.).
Side-by-side stereo pairs can also be viewed with the unaided eye by focusing on each image separately and allowing the eyes to cross. If you wear glasses, it may be necessary to remove them and view the pairs from 6 to 10 inches away. These techniques may require some practice (the Apollo 15, 16 and 17 stereo pairs are good for this purpose). Another means of assisting this process is to place an index card upright between the two images, forcing each eye to see the different images. Only approximately 10% of the general public cannot view images stereoscopically.
Surface Views of the Landing Site
|Looking North from the Apollo 17 Landing Site|
|Looking East from the Apollo 17 Landing Site|
|Looking South from the Apollo 17 Landing Site|
|Looking West from the Apollo 17 Landing Site|