On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 17:14 -0700, Yan Fernandez wrote:
> To everyone else - Any other comments? Deadline is late Tuesday night.
OK, I went and looked out the outline. Looks good.
The only comment I have is that it's pretty clear that Cold Classical
TNOs are quite distinct from hot classical TNOs, so they really ought to
be a different group in the outline. Whether hot classical and resonant
objects ought to be similarly split is less clear-cut to me, but at
least the Cold Classicals really ought to get treated separately. Of
course, this then raises questions about whether or not important
distinctions lurk among Centaurs and ecliptic comets in terms of those
having originated in the Cold Classical belt versus others that formed
|Author: ||W. Grundy <W.Grundy@lowell.edu>|
|Date: ||04-Aug-2010 03:31:24|