Index Thread Archive Aug-2010 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Aug-2010Index by Author for Aug-2010Index by Date for Aug-2010   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: sbag
Author: W. Grundy <W.Grundy@lowell.edu>
Date: 04-Aug-2010 03:31:24
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 17:14 -0700, Yan Fernandez wrote: > > To everyone else - Any other comments? Deadline is late Tuesday night. > Thanks > --Yan OK, I went and looked out the outline. Looks good. The only comment I have is that it's pretty clear that Cold Classical TNOs are quite distinct from hot classical TNOs, so they really ought to be a different group in the outline. Whether hot classical and resonant objects ought to be similarly split is less clear-cut to me, but at least the Cold Classicals really ought to get treated separately. Of course, this then raises questions about whether or not important distinctions lurk among Centaurs and ecliptic comets in terms of those having originated in the Cold Classical belt versus others that formed closer in... --- Will

This Thread
  Date   Author  
04-Aug-2010 Carey M. Lisse
* 04-Aug-2010 W. Grundy
This Author (Aug-2010)
  Subject   Date  
* sbag 04-Aug-2010