Index Thread Archive Nov-2010 Archive Send
 Main index   Previous in threadNext in thread   Previous in archiveNext in archive   Index by Subject for Nov-2010Index by Author for Nov-2010Index by Date for Nov-2010   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive   Reply to messageNew message 

Subject: PDF-File-Verify-Sender:
Author: Carey M. Lisse <>
Date: 22-Nov-2010 11:21:41
Joe, I second Andy's question - these objects are some of the prime focus items of the OPAG group and their next flagship mission, and we have plenty on our plate. - Casey ________________________________________ From: Nuth, Joseph A. (GSFC-6900) [] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:16 AM To: Subject: RE: PDF-File-Verify-Sender:[SBAG Science Issues] Andy, I had put these bodies into the Science Issues section for completeness – and no one objected. We have had a presentation on a proposed JPL rendezvous mission to Triton at our first meeting. While I agree that these bodies are not the small bodies that I am interested in, we do have Pluto and KBOs as well. In this light the large icy satellites are not out of place. Joe From: Rivkin, Andy S. [] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 9:57 AM To: Subject: Re: PDF-File-Verify-Sender:[SBAG Science Issues] Just curious what this part implies: On 11/10/10 10:04 AM, "Nuth, Joseph A. (GSFC-6900)" wrote: • Large, Icy Satellites of the Giant Planets Presumably we’re not taking on Ganymede/Titan/Triton/etc in the small bodies roadmap? -Andy

This Thread
  Date   Author  
22-Nov-2010 Joseph A. (GSFC-6900) Nuth
22-Nov-2010 Andy S. Rivkin
22-Nov-2010 Joseph A. (GSFC-6900) Nuth
* 22-Nov-2010 Carey M. Lisse
22-Nov-2010 Joseph A. (GSFC-6900) Nuth
22-Nov-2010 Andy S. Rivkin
This Author (Nov-2010)
  Subject   Date  
<no subject> 16-Nov-2010
* PDF-File-Verify-Sender: 22-Nov-2010